Compare Lab
Cognigy vs Vapi
Cognigy is positioned as enterprise agent workflows and Voice Gateway for existing contact-center environments. Vapi is positioned as a developer-oriented orchestration platform for phone and web agents with configurable providers
Cognigy is positioned as enterprise agent workflows and Voice Gateway for existing contact-center environments. Vapi is positioned as a developer-oriented orchestration platform for phone and web agents with configurable providers. Start by deciding who owns the missing layers, then inspect the documented differences below.
Enterprise Platforms and Full Platforms are different product categories. An underlying engine or framework is not a complete substitute for a deployed agent workflow.
18 jointly documented catalog fields. This measures evidence coverage, not equivalent quality or an overall winner.
Test opening hours, booking conflicts and an unanswered transfer.
Start where the records differ.
Values and evidence states are compared together. Shared facts follow the differences; Unknown never means No.
| Decision point | Cognigy | Vapi |
|---|---|---|
| Billing modelDifferent records | custom-sales-led | platform-plus-pass-through |
| Billing unitDifferent records | Unknown | minute |
| Bring your telephonyDifferent records | Yes | Yes |
| Warm transferDifferent records | Unknown | Yes |
| WebhooksDifferent records | YesUnknown | YesAPI / webhook |
| Bring your modelShared state | Yes | Yes |
Your requirements & next steps
Your requirements
Ready-made / AI receptionist · Strict evidence mode
No personal requirements yet. Add criteria in Advanced Filter to prioritize this comparison.
Sales-led enterprise component deployment; no public complete rate table in captured product documentation.
Reviewed current public offer; retain original billing scope and units.
Exact licensed components, speech/model/carrier pass-through and enterprise minimum require a quote.
Reviewed current public offer; retain original billing scope and units.
Exact licensed components, speech/model/carrier pass-through and enterprise minimum require a quote.
Reviewed current public offer; retain original billing scope and units.
Exact licensed components, speech/model/carrier pass-through and enterprise minimum require a quote.
Reviewed current public offer; retain original billing scope and units.
Enterprise product and trial documentation reviewed; no complete current commercial schedule/eligibility or bundled provider costs established. Trial Knowledge AI does not inherit contracted SLA.
Reviewed current public offer; retain original billing scope and units.
Enterprise product and trial documentation reviewed; no complete current commercial schedule/eligibility or bundled provider costs established. Trial Knowledge AI does not inherit contracted SLA.
Reviewed current public offer; retain original billing scope and units.
Barge-in can increase speech subscription costs; contract determines payment route.
Reviewed current public offer; retain original billing scope and units.
Not yet researched against this buyer-critical field standard.
Reviewed current public offer; retain original billing scope and units.
Exact licensed components, speech/model/carrier pass-through and enterprise minimum require a quote.
Provider choices, tokens, carrier and optional support/compliance fees are not fixed by minutes alone.
Exact licensed components, speech/model/carrier pass-through and enterprise minimum require a quote.
Research conclusion about cost completeness, not a vendor capability.
Anyone with this link can view the encoded decision criteria.
Vendor documentation establishes a claim. Public model benchmarks are separate context, not measurements of these platforms.
Open saved comparison ↗What to verify together.
Cognigy
No public unit price was established; request itemized platform, speech, carrier and support costs.
Custom quote / current rate unresolved · V3.3 evidence review · Enterprise contract; complete public numeric schedule unavailable
Excluded / confirm: Complete cost cannot be established from this reference. Exact licensed components, speech/model/carrier pass-through and enterprise minimum require a quote. · Carrier and speech-provider subscription costs may apply
Sales-led enterprise component deployment; no public complete rate table in captured product documentation.
Vapi
The $0.05 hosting charge is only one component of the call bill.
$0.05/min Vapi hosting · V3.3 evidence review · Hosting only; model, speech, carrier and compliance/support add-ons extra
Excluded / confirm: Complete cost cannot be established from this reference. Provider choices, tokens, carrier and optional support/compliance fees are not fixed by minutes alone. · LLM, transcriber, voice and carrier charges; HIPAA add-on $2,000/month
Reviewed current public offer; retain original billing scope and units.
The evidence overlap.
Both records have documented values for Product type, Technical setup, Pricing model, ElevenLabs TTS, Deepgram STT, OpenAI models, Anthropic models, Google models, Bring your model, MCP tools, Knowledge base / RAG, Function / tool calling and additional fields shown in Compare. Matching availability does not measure behavior under your call conditions.
Run the same booking, tool failure and unsuccessful human-transfer cases. Record both outcomes and billable units before signing a deployment agreement.
Build a buyer-operated pilot →